The Difference Between Stock Market Investors and Speculators


wealthymatters.com

The following is an excerpt from Seth Klarman’s ‘Margin of Safety.’I got around to reading this book based on the recommendations of one of the readers of this blog.Thank you Andy!I think the following is a nice way of making a distinction between stock market investment and speculation.BTW the book is pretty nice and I will blog more about it as and when I come across more interesting stuff.

 

 

 

To investors stocks represent fractional ownership of underlying businesses and bonds are loans to those businesses.Investors make buy and sell decisions on the basis of the current prices of securities compared with the perceived values of those securities. They transact when they think they know something that others don’t know, don’t care about, or prefer to ignore. They buy securities that appear to offer attractive return for the risk incurred and sell when the return no longer justifies the risk.Investors believe that over the long run security prices tend to reflect fundamental developments involving the underlying businesses. Investors in a stock thus expect to profit in at least one of three possible ways: from free cash flow generated by the underlying business, which eventually will be reflected in a higher share price or distributed as dividends; from an increase in the multiple that investors are willing to pay for the underlying business as reflected in a higher share price; or by a narrowing of the gap between share price and underlying business value.Speculators, by contrast, buy and sell securities based on whether they believe those securities will next rise or fall inprice. Their judgment regarding future price movements is based, not on fundamentals, but on a prediction of the behavior of others. They regard securities as pieces of paper to be swapped back and forth and are generally ignorant of or indifferentto investment fundamentals. They buy securities because they “act” well and sell when they don’t. Indeed, even if it were certain that the world would end tomorrow, it is likely that some speculators would continue to trade securities based on what they thought the market would do today.Speculators are obsessed with predicting-guessing-the direction of stock prices. Every morning on cable television,every afternoon on the stock market report, every weekend in Barron’s,every week in dozens of market newsletters, andwhenever businesspeople get together, there is rampant conjecture on where the market is heading. Many speculators attempt to predict the market direction by using technical analysis-past stock price fluctuations-as a guide. Technical analysis is based on the presumption that past share price meanderings,rather than underlying business value, hold the key to future stock prices. In reality, no one knows what the market will do;trying to predict it is a waste of time, and investing based upon that prediction is a speculative undertaking.

The Polyester Prince


wealthymatters.com‘The Polyester Prince ‘ by Hamish McDonald is an unofficial biography of Shri Dhirubhai Ambani.I personally enjoyed the book and gained from reading it.There is much in the book to inspire people starting out on their personal entrepreneurial journeys.

Dhirubhai was not born to privilege.He didn’t have much of a formal education.It was sheer enterprise , hard work , measured risk taking , a fighting – spirit , good people skills , networking , thinking out of the box , seizing opportunities and great execution skills that helped him make his fortune.This book details many of the incidents of his life.It can be mined for information on how to grow one’s business and deal with the day to day problems faced in building a business from scratch.

Dhirubhai held the opinion that there could literally be thousands like him.This book is a great gift to give an friend who could potentially be one of those few thousand.Dhirubhai’s life-story is the encouragement and in this book is the information needed to get started as an entrepreneur.

How Wealthy People Behave That The Poor Do Not


wealthymatters.comFollowing is a list of the differences in the habits of the wealthy and the poor found in the book “Secrets of the Millionaire Mind-Mastering the Inner Game Of Wealth” by T. Harv Eker.I have found these distinctions to be quite true.And if you think about the actual behaviour of richer and poorer people you personally know you will be able to verify the differences yourself.

I use this checklist periodically to check my own thought patterns and behaviour and correct them.I have personally benefitted from this exercise and I urge you to try it.

Wealthy people believe, “I create my life.” Poor people believe, “Life happens to me.”

Wealthy people play the money game to win. Poor people play the money game to not lose.

Wealthy people are committed to being rich. Poor people want to be rich.

Wealthy people think big. Poor people think small.

Wealthy people focus on opportunities. Poor people focus on obstacles.

Wealthy people admire other rich and successful people. Poor people resent rich and successful people.

Wealthy people associate with positive, successful people. Poor people associate with negative or unsuccessful people.

Wealthy people are willing to promote themselves and their value. Poor people think negatively about selling and promotion.

Wealthy people are bigger than their problems. Poor people are smaller than their problems.

Wealthy people are excellent receivers. Poor people are poor receivers.

Wealthy people choose to get paid based on results. Poor people choose to get paid based on time.

Wealthy people think “both”. Poor people think “either/or”.

Wealthy people focus on their net worth. Poor people focus on their working income.

Wealthy people manage their money well. Poor people mismanage their money well.

Wealthy people have their money work hard for them. Poor people work hard for their money.

Wealthy people act in spite of fear. Poor people let fear stop them.

Wealthy people constantly learn and grow. Poor people think they already know.

Indian Style Philanthropy


Conversations about charity and philanthropy often make me acutely uncomfortable.There is a bit too much sanctimony, one upmanship and pretence for my tastes.Unfortunately ever since Warren Buffet came up with his “The Giving Pledge” , philanthropy is frequently in the news and such conversations have become increasingly commonplace. I just don’t think much of using social pressure to get individuals to comply.It just offends the Libertarian in me.Moreover,I find it hard to see every act of charity I hear of as completely altruistic and having to go through the motions of pretending otherwise is a drag.Worse , I’m all too aware of my own motivations and social expectations of altruism makes giving so stressful.

For people like me ,I come across something interesting while reading last Thursday’s Economic Times newspaper.In an article reviewing the book  “Stages of Capital: Law, Culture, and Market Governance in Late Colonial India” by Ritu Birla there is a mention of different types of donations practised by traditional Jain merchants of Jaipur such as:

  • anukampa-dan, a gift given out of compassion;
  • ucit-dan, a gift given out of duty;
  • kirti-dan, a gift given to earn fame;
  • abhay-dan, a gift of fearlessness;
  • supatra-dan, a gift of religion.

This approach of accepting that donations have various motivations,and according all such donations, irrespective of motivations, legitimacy makes it so much easier to talk about charity,gifting and philanthropy.It doesn’t expect the giver to be a altruistic saint all the time.Nor does it demean the receiver since he/she helps the giver to get something of value in return.Overall it saves a lot of agony and agonizing in the giver,receiver and society at large.